翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Smith Township, Posey County, Indiana ・ Smith Township, Washington County, Pennsylvania ・ Smith Township, Whitley County, Indiana ・ Smith v Croft (No 2) ・ Smith v Eric S Bush ・ Smith v Gardner Merchant ・ Smith v Glasgow City District Council ・ Smith v Hughes ・ Smith v Knights of Columbus ・ Smith v Land and House Property Corp ・ Smith v Leech Brain & Co Ltd ・ Smith v Littlewoods Organisation Ltd ・ Smith v Parsons ・ Smith v Smith ・ Smith v. Allwright ・ Smith v. Board of School Commissioners of Mobile County ・ Smith v. Bolles ・ Smith v. California ・ Smith v. Commissioner ・ Smith v. Doe ・ Smith v. Goguen ・ Smith v. Kansas City Title & Trust Co. ・ Smith v. Maryland ・ Smith v. Pilots Union ・ Smith v. Spisak ・ Smith v. Summit Entertainment LLC ・ Smith v. Texas ・ Smith v. Texas (2007) ・ Smith v. United States ・ Smith v. Van Gorkom Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Smith v. Board of School Commissioners of Mobile County ： ウィキペディア英語版 Smith v. Board of School Commissioners of Mobile County ''Smith v. Board of School Commissioners of Mobile County'', 827 F.2d 684 (11th Cir. 1987), was a lawsuit in which the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit held that the Mobile, Alabama schools could use textbooks which purportedly promoted "secular humanism", characterized by the complainants as a religion. Parents and other citizens brought a lawsuit against the school board, alleging that the school system was teaching the tenets of secular humanism, an anti-theistic religion. The complainants asked that forty-four different elementary through high school level textbooks be removed from the curriculum. After an initial ruling〔(Smith v. Board of School Com'rs of Mobile County, 655 F. Supp. 939 - Dist. Court, SD Alabama 1987 ), via Google Scholar〕 in a federal district court in favor of the plaintiffs, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit ruled〔(Smith v. Board of School Com'rs of Mobile County, 827 F. 2d 684 - Court of Appeals, 11th Circuit 1987 ), via Google Scholar〕 that as long as the school was motivated by a secular purpose, it didn't matter whether the curriculum and texts shared ideas held by one or more religious groups. The Court found that the texts in question promoted important secular values (tolerance, self-respect, logical decision making) and thus the use of the textbooks neither unconstitutionally advanced a nontheistic religion nor inhibited theistic religions. ==References== 〔http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/827/684/3220/〕 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Smith v. Board of School Commissioners of Mobile County」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.